Weiss v. Sondok
This text of 282 A.D. 948 (Weiss v. Sondok) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by plaintiff Dorothy Weiss to recover damages for personal injuries and by her husband for medical expenses and loss of services, order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs, with leave to plaintiffs to plead over, if so advised, within ten days after the entry of the order hereon. The complaint should state the facts upon which plaintiffs rely for their cause of action. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 241; Schweitzer v. Mmdlin, 248 N. Y. 560; Pagnillo v. Mack Paving <& Constr. Co., 142 App. Div. 491; Beatty v. McCutcheon, 200 App. Div. 869.) Nolan, P. J., Adel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 A.D. 948, 125 N.Y.S.2d 162, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-sondok-nyappdiv-1953.