Weiss v. Sondok

282 A.D. 948, 125 N.Y.S.2d 162, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5539

Opinion

In an action by plaintiff Dorothy Weiss to recover damages for personal injuries and by her husband for medical expenses and loss of services, order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs, with leave to plaintiffs to plead over, if so advised, within ten days after the entry of the order hereon. The complaint should state the facts upon which plaintiffs rely for their cause of action. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 241; Schweitzer v. Mmdlin, 248 N. Y. 560; Pagnillo v. Mack Paving <& Constr. Co., 142 App. Div. 491; Beatty v. McCutcheon, 200 App. Div. 869.) Nolan, P. J., Adel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weiss v. Sondok, 282 A.D. 948, 125 N.Y.S.2d 162, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5539 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

282 A.D. 948 (Weiss v. Sondok) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schweitzer v. Mindlin
162 N.E. 524 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
Pagnillo v. Mack Paving & Construction Co.
142 A.D. 491 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Beatty v. McCutcheon
200 A.D. 869 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)