Home/New York Court of Appeals/Schweitzer v. Mindlin

Schweitzer v. Mindlin

162 N.E. 524, 248 N.Y. 560, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1362
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 11, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 162 N.E. 524 (Schweitzer v. Mindlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schweitzer v. Mindlin, 162 N.E. 524, 248 N.Y. 560, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1362 (N.Y. 1928).

Opinion

Order of Appellate Division and that of Special Term reversed and defendant’s motion for judgment granted, with costs in all courts. Question certified answered in *561 the negative. Held, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in that it fails to state any facts from which an inference of negligence is possible.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrew's, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heisler v. State
78 A.D.2d 767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Patterson v. State
54 A.D.2d 147 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Pritzker v. Falk
58 Misc. 2d 989 (New York Supreme Court, 1969)
Weiss v. Sondok
282 A.D. 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
Campo v. Scofield
95 N.E.2d 802 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)
Foley v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.
136 Misc. 468 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 N.E. 524, 248 N.Y. 560, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schweitzer-v-mindlin-ny-1928.