Schweitzer v. Mindlin
162 N.E. 524, 248 N.Y. 560, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1362
Opinion
Order of Appellate Division and that of Special Term reversed and defendant’s motion for judgment granted, with costs in all courts. Question certified answered in *561 the negative. Held, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in that it fails to state any facts from which an inference of negligence is possible.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrew's, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schweitzer v. Mindlin, 162 N.E. 524, 248 N.Y. 560, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1362 (N.Y. 1928).
162 N.E. 524 (Schweitzer v. Mindlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Heisler v. State
78 A.D.2d 767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Patterson v. State
54 A.D.2d 147 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Pritzker v. Falk
58 Misc. 2d 989 (New York Supreme Court, 1969)
Weiss v. Sondok
282 A.D. 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
Campo v. Scofield
95 N.E.2d 802 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)
Foley v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.
136 Misc. 468 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)