Weisner v. Google LLC

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedApril 4, 2023
Docket1:20-cv-02862
StatusUnknown

This text of Weisner v. Google LLC (Weisner v. Google LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weisner v. Google LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------- x SHOLEM WEISNER, : : Plaintiff, : ORDER : -against- : 20 Civ. 2862 (AKH) : : GOOGLE LLC and SHMUEL NEMANOV. : : Defendant and Involuntary Party. : : --------------------------------------------------------------- x ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.: Pursuant to Markman v. Westview Instr., Inc. 517 U.S. 370 (1998), the Court has reviewed the parties’ respective positions regarding ambiguities in the claim language of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,394,905 and 10,642,911. After consideration of the proposed constructions submitted by the parties, the Court adopts the constructions set out in Column Four of the attached chart. SO ORDERED. Dated: April _4__, 2023 _/s_/_ A__lv_i_n_ H__e_ll_e_rs_t_e_in_______ New York, New York ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN United States District Judge Case 1:20-cv-02862-AKH Document 141 Filed 04/04/23 Page 2 of 15 Weisner et al. v. Google LLC, Case No.: 20-cv-02862-AKH U.S. Patent Nos. 10,394,905 and 10,642,911 Plaintiff Weisner’s Proposed Defendant’s (Google) Claim Phrase1,2 Court’s Construction Construction3 Proposed Construction ‘905 Specifications 4:30-55: Methods and systems of Id. 17: 10-65 enhancing searches for a Id. 18: 1-65 business by use of records of Id. 19:1-65 humans' physical encounters. Id. 20:1-65 Preamble is limiting; The Id. 21: 1-10 claimed method/system Id 4:3-55 adjusts search result rankings ’905 Patent, Claims 1, 11 and 14, by consulting records of Preamble The method of enhancing humans’ physical encounters computerized internet to identify physical location searches for history entries members have “method/system of combining for a target business in common. enhanced [computerized] by implementing utilization searching for a target business of human (individual member with use of humans as physical carrying a mobile device) See, e.g., FH-000439, FH- encounter links” physical encounters with 000447-49, FH-000451, FH- business locations as ranking 00627, FH-00689-90, ’905 parameters to improve, patent at 4:35-55, 17:53-18:35, custom tailor, and personalize FIG. 9; see also FH-000219- web search results. 220, FH-000264-266. 1 Disclaimer: listing a claim phrase in this table on January 12, 2023 does not prevent a party from taking a position at a later date that the claim phrase requires no construction or that a listed claim phrase should either be broken into shorter phrases or combined with other phrases to form a longer listed claim phrase. -1- Case 1:20-cv-02862-AKH Document 141 Filed 04/04/23 Page 3 of 15 Weisner et al. v. Google LLC, Case No.: 20-cv-02862-AKH U.S. Patent Nos. 10,394,905 and 10,642,911 Plaintiff Weisner’s Proposed Defendant’s (Google) Claim Phrase1,2 Court’s Construction Construction3 Proposed Construction 905 Specification; 4: 45 No construction necessary. Id. 14:30 Processing system that utilizes manipulation and control of information (data) within the computer No construction necessary; ’905 Patent, Claims 1, 11 and 14 system that houses the plain and ordinary meaning. database. ’911 Patent, Claims 1 and 12 See, e.g., ’905 patent at FIGs. 1-6, 9, 2:33-41, 3:30-32, 4:36- “processing system” 55, 21:34. 2 For listed phrases that are partially bolded, Google proposes to construe those parts of the claims that are bolded (having originally used ellipses in place of intervening words in the claim for which it was not requesting a construction). The non-bolded parts comprise additional language appearing in the claims that neither party proposes to construe; Plaintiff asked that the ellipses should be filled in the Patent Claim language so the phrase would reflect the Patent Claim. Bracketed words are provided where largely the same phrase is included in multiple claims with the differences shown by the bracketed words. 3 Plaintiff Weisner reserves his ability to cite to other Claim Specifications in the 905 and 911 Patents as supported herein and is not bound by the Claim specification(s) cited herein. -2- Case 1:20-cv-02862-AKH Document 141 Filed 04/04/23 Page 4 of 15 Weisner et al. v. Google LLC, Case No.: 20-cv-02862-AKH U.S. Patent Nos. 10,394,905 and 10,642,911 Plaintiff Weisner’s Proposed Defendant’s (Google) Claim Phrase1,2 Court’s Construction Construction3 Proposed Construction No construction necessary. Id. 3:20-30 Id. 4:25-30 Id. 8:30-45 Software installed on a device that allows a user to interact No construction necessary; ’905 Patent, Claims 1 and 14 with their account at system plain and ordinary meaning. network database. See, e.g., ’905 patent at 3:23- “providing an application” 29, 4:24-31, 8:31-47, 9:30-31, 9:37-46, 14:27-34, 15:21-30.

-3- Case 1:20-cv-02862-AKH Document 141 Filed 04/04/23 Page 5 of 15 Weisner et al. v. Google LLC, Case No.: 20-cv-02862-AKH U.S. Patent Nos. 10,394,905 and 10,642,911 Plaintiff Weisner’s Proposed Defendant’s (Google) Claim Phrase1,2 Court’s Construction Construction3 Proposed Construction Id. 7:45-55 When an individual who is Id. 11:10-40 a member of the network Id. 15:45-60 enters the physical business ’905 Patent, Claims 1, 11 and 14 When an individual member location of a stationary Upon a Physical Encounter enters a stationary vendor vendor which is also part of “upon a physical encounter m phe ya sn icin ag ll yth ea nt t ea r m edo b ai le user m loe cm atib oe nr ’ ts h p ath y cs ai uca sel sb u ansi ness the network, that causes an between the individual member stationary member business application on the individual application on the and a stationary vendor member premises (Stationary vendor member’s device to, at that individual member’s device of a plurality of stationary vendor means any business/ vendor time, automatically transmit to to automatically transmit to members of the member network who sells goods, or services at a the processing system the the processing system the [at a physical premises of the location) that is part of a “key data” of the stationary individual member’s “key stationary vendor member], to plurality of stationary vendor member and of the transmit key data of the vendor members. data” and “key data” received individual member. stationary vendor member and of Key data (meaning URLs, or from the stationary vendor the individual member to the information attached to members' member. processing system automatically accounts and system network URLs such as location data, type of See, e.g., ’905 patent at as a result of the physical business, date/time data, contact Abstract, 1:6-10, 2:33-41, encounter” information, physical encounters, 3:18-29, 15:15-23, 11:9- etc.) from both the business 29; see also ’905 patent at and store visitor are FIG. 3, 7:45-55, 8:31-43, 9:5- automatically transmitted to 8, 11:29-39, 15:45-60, FH- the processing system to be 00311-312, FH-000439. implemented in improving web search results. -4- Case 1:20-cv-02862-AKH Document 141 Filed 04/04/23 Page 6 of 15 Weisner et al. v. Google LLC, Case No.: 20-cv-02862-AKH U.S. Patent Nos. 10,394,905 and 10,642,911 Plaintiff Weisner’s Proposed Defendant’s (Google) Claim Phrase1,2 Court’s Construction Construction3 Proposed Construction Id 13:30-35 The individual member The individual member Id 15:45-50 entering and exchanging “key entering and exchanging ’905 Patent, Claims 1, 11 and 14 data” with the stationary “key data” with the The application software vendor member triggers the stationary vendor member “[upon] a location of each determines instances of physical positioning system to automatically causes the individual member’s [device] visits to business locations by determine the location of the positioning system to determined by the positioning making use of a positioning individual member [device]. determine the location of the system” system such as GPS or any individual member [device].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weisner v. Google LLC
51 F.4th 1073 (Federal Circuit, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Weisner v. Google LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weisner-v-google-llc-nysd-2023.