Weisner v. Google LLC

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided April 4, 2023·No. 1:20-cv-02862·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------- x SHOLEM WEISNER, : : Plaintiff, : ORDER : -against- : 20 Civ. 2862 (AKH) : : GOOGLE LLC and SHMUEL NEMANOV. : : Defendant and Involuntary Party. : : --------------------------------------------------------------- x ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.: Pursuant to Markman v. Westview Instr., Inc. 517 U.S. 370 (1998), the Court has reviewed the parties’ respective positions regarding ambiguities in the claim language of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,394,905 and 10,642,911. After consideration of the proposed constructions submitted by the parties, the Court adopts the constructions set out in Column Four of the attached chart. SO ORDERED. Dated: April _4__, 2023 _/s_/_ A__lv_i_n_ H__e_ll_e_rs_t_e_in_______ New York, New York ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN United States District Judge Case 1:20-cv-02862-AKH Document 141 Filed 04/04/23 Page 2 of 15 Weisner et al. v. Google LLC, Case No.: 20-cv-02862-AKH U.S. Patent Nos. 10,394,905 and 10,642,911 Plaintiff Weisner’s Proposed Defendant’s (Google) Claim Phrase1,2 Court’s Construction Construction3 Proposed Construction ‘905 Specifications 4:30-55: Methods and systems of Id. 17: 10-65 enhancing searches for a Id. 18: 1-65 business by use of records of Id. 19:1-65 humans' physical encounters. Id. 20:1-65 Preamble is limiting; The Id. 21: 1-10 claimed method/system Id 4:3-55 adjusts search result rankings ’905 Patent, Claims 1, 11 and 14, by consulting records of Preamble The method of enhancing humans’ physical encounters computerized internet to identify physical location searches for history entries members have “method/system of combining for a target business in common. enhanced [computerized] by implementing utilization searching for a target business of human (individual member with use of humans as physical carrying a mobile device) See, e.g., FH-000439, FH- encounter links” physical encounters with 000447-49, FH-000451, FH- business locations as ranking 00627, FH-00689-90, ’905 parameters to improve, patent at 4:35-55, 17:53-18:35, custom tailor, and personalize FIG. 9; see also FH-000219- web search results. 220, FH-000264-266. 1 Disclaimer: listing a claim phrase in this table on January 12, 2023 does not prevent a party from taking a position at a later date that the claim phrase requires no construction or that a listed claim phrase should either be broken into shorter phrases or combined with other phrases to form a longer listed claim phrase. -1- Case 1:20-cv-02862-AKH Document 141 Filed 04/04/23 Page 3 of 15 Weisner et al. v. Google LLC, Case No.: 20-cv-02862-AKH U.S. Patent Nos. 10,394,905 and 10,642,911 Plaintiff Weisner’s Proposed Defendant’s (Google) Claim Phrase1,2 Court’s Construction Construction3 Proposed Construction 905 Specification; 4: 45 No construction necessary. Id. 14:30 Processing system that utilizes manipulation and control of information (data) within the computer No construction necessary; ’905 Patent, Claims 1, 11 and 14 system that houses the plain and ordinary meaning. database. ’911 Patent, Claims 1 and 12 See, e.g., ’905 patent at FIGs. 1-6, 9, 2:33-41, 3:30-32, 4:36- “processing system” 55, 21:34. 2 For listed phrases that are partially bolded, Google proposes to construe those parts of the claims that are bolded (having originally used ellipses in place of intervening words in the claim for which it was not requesting a construction). The non-bolded parts comprise additional language appearing in the claims that neither party proposes to construe; Plaintiff asked that the ellipses should be filled in the Patent Claim language so the phrase would reflect the Patent Claim. Bracketed words are provided where largely the same phrase is included in multiple claims with the differences shown by the bracketed words. 3 Plaintiff Weisner reserves his ability to cite to other Claim Specifications in the 905 and 911 Patents as supported herein and is not bound by the Claim specification(s) cited herein. -2- Case 1:20-cv-02862-AKH Document 141 Filed 04/04/23 Page 4 of 15 Weisner et al. v. Google LLC, Case No.: 20-cv-02862-AKH U.S. Patent Nos. 10,394,905 and 10,642,911 Plaintiff Weisner’s Proposed Defendant’s (Google) Claim Phrase1,2 Court’s Construction Construction3 Proposed Construction No construction necessary. Id. 3:20-30 Id. 4:25-30 Id. 8:30-45 Software installed on a device that allows a user to interact No construction necessary; ’905 Patent, Claims 1 and 14 with their account at system plain and ordinary meaning. network database. See, e.g., ’905 patent at 3:23- “providing an application” 29, 4:24-31, 8:31-47, 9:30-31, 9:37-46, 14:27-34, 15:21-30.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weisner v. Google LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Weisner v. Google LLC (Weisner v. Google LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weisner v. Google LLC
51 F.4th 1073 (Federal Circuit, 2022)