Weisbarth v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weisbarth v. Board of Education

76 A.D.2d 841, 428 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11891

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 76 A.D.2d 841 (Weisbarth v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weisbarth v. Board of Education, 76 A.D.2d 841, 428 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondent board of education to reinstate petitioner as a tenured teacher in the East Meadow Union Free School District, with back pay, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 24, 1979, which dismissed the proceeding on the ground that petitioner failed to serve a notice of claim upon respondents in accordance with section 3813 of the Education Law. Judgment reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and proceeding remitted to Special Term for a determination on the merits. Section 3813 of the Education Law is not applicable since petitioner seeks enforcement of tenure rights, a matter of public interest (see Matter of Tadken v Board of Educ., 65 AD2d 820, mot [842]*842for lv to app den 46 NY2d 711; Matter of Gross v Board of Educ., 73 AD2d 949). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondent board of education to reinstate petitioner as a tenured teacher in the East Meadow Union Free School District, with back pay, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 24, 1979, which dismissed the proceeding on the ground that petitioner failed to serve a notice of claim upon respondents in accordance with section 3813 of the Education Law. Judgment reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and proceeding remitted to Special Term for a determination on the merits. Section 3813 of the Education Law is not applicable since petitioner seeks enforcement of tenure rights, a matter of public interest (see Matter of Tadken v Board of Educ., 65 AD2d 820, mot [842]*842for lv to app den 46 NY2d 711; Matter of Gross v Board of Educ., 73 AD2d 949). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 A.D.2d 841, 428 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weisbarth-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack