Weintraub v. Pacific West Roofing
200 P.3d 613, 225 Or. App. 201, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 8
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided January 7, 2009·No. 040606531; A129985·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals, challenging the allowance of summary judgment for defendants in a construction defect case. Defendants acknowledge that, in light of Harris v. Suniga, 344 Or 301, 180 P3d 12 (2008), the allowance of summary judgment was erroneous. We accept that concession as well founded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weintraub v. Pacific West Roofing, 200 P.3d 613, 225 Or. App. 201, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 8 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
200 P.3d 613 (Weintraub v. Pacific West Roofing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weintraub v. PACIFIC WEST ROOFING
200 P.3d 613 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)