Weintraub v. Pacific West Roofing
200 P.3d 613, 225 Or. App. 201, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 8
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJanuary 7, 2009
Docket040606531; A129985
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 200 P.3d 613 (Weintraub v. Pacific West Roofing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Weintraub v. Pacific West Roofing, 200 P.3d 613, 225 Or. App. 201, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 8 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals, challenging the allowance of summary judgment for defendants in a construction defect case. Defendants acknowledge that, in light of Harris v. Suniga, 344 Or 301, 180 P3d 12 (2008), the allowance of summary judgment was erroneous. We accept that concession as well founded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Weintraub v. PACIFIC WEST ROOFING
200 P.3d 613 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
200 P.3d 613, 225 Or. App. 201, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weintraub-v-pacific-west-roofing-orctapp-2009.