Weinfeld v. Funk

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Weinfeld v. Funk

20 A.2d 206, 342 Pa. 160, 1941 Pa. LEXIS 497

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 24, 1941

DocketAppeal, 135

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 20 A.2d 206 (Weinfeld v. Funk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weinfeld v. Funk, 20 A.2d 206, 342 Pa. 160, 1941 Pa. LEXIS 497 (Pa. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. In its opinion, the court states: “After a careful review of the entire case, we reached the firm conclusion that justice demanded that plaintiff’s motion for a new trial be sustained.” We have uniformly held that under such circumstances we will not review the action of the court below: Reese v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co., 336 Pa. 299, 9 A. 2d 394; Kerr v. Hofer, 341 Pa. 47, 17 A. 2d 886.

The order of the court below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. In its opinion, the court states: “After a careful review of the entire case, we reached the firm conclusion that justice demanded that plaintiff’s motion for a new trial be sustained.” We have uniformly held that under such circumstances we will not review the action of the court below: Reese v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co., 336 Pa. 299, 9 A. 2d 394; Kerr v. Hofer, 341 Pa. 47, 17 A. 2d 886.

The order of the court below is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.2d 206, 342 Pa. 160, 1941 Pa. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinfeld-v-funk-pa-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack