Kerr Et Ux. v. Hofer (Et Al.)
17 A.2d 886, 341 Pa. 47, 1941 Pa. LEXIS 379
Opinion
It is contended by appellant that the court below abused its discretion and acted in an arbitrary manner in granting two new trials in this case. In its opinion following the last trial, the court states, “the interests of right and justice require that this case should be retried.” We will not interfere with the action of the trial court under such circumstances: Reese v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co., 336 Pa. 299, 9 A. 2d 394.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kerr Et Ux. v. Hofer (Et Al.), 17 A.2d 886, 341 Pa. 47, 1941 Pa. LEXIS 379 (Pa. 1941).
17 A.2d 886 (Kerr Et Ux. v. Hofer (Et Al.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ross v. Crisanti
90 A.2d 299 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)
Bellettiere v. Philadelphia
81 A.2d 857 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Rosanoff v. Duquesne University
74 A.2d 172 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Durdella v. Rothman
49 A.2d 64 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Auslander v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.
39 A.2d 595 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
Zoni v. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.
33 A.2d 445 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Gerber v. Jones (Et Al.)
30 A.2d 534 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Powell v. Garden Court Corp.
22 A.2d 605 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Phillips v. American Stores Co.
20 A.2d 190 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Weinfeld v. Funk
20 A.2d 206 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Watson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
21 A.2d 503 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)