Kerr Et Ux. v. Hofer (Et Al.)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Kerr Et Ux. v. Hofer (Et Al.)

17 A.2d 886, 341 Pa. 47, 1941 Pa. LEXIS 379

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 31, 1941

DocketAppeal, 23

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 17 A.2d 886 (Kerr Et Ux. v. Hofer (Et Al.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kerr Et Ux. v. Hofer (Et Al.), 17 A.2d 886, 341 Pa. 47, 1941 Pa. LEXIS 379 (Pa. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

It is contended by appellant that the court below abused its discretion and acted in an arbitrary manner in granting two new trials in this case. In its opinion following the last trial, the court states, “the interests of right and justice require that this case should be retried.” We will not interfere with the action of the trial court under such circumstances: Reese v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co., 336 Pa. 299, 9 A. 2d 394.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

It is contended by appellant that the court below abused its discretion and acted in an arbitrary manner in granting two new trials in this case. In its opinion following the last trial, the court states, “the interests of right and justice require that this case should be retried.” We will not interfere with the action of the trial court under such circumstances: Reese v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co., 336 Pa. 299, 9 A. 2d 394.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.2d 886, 341 Pa. 47, 1941 Pa. LEXIS 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerr-et-ux-v-hofer-et-al-pa-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack