Weiner v. Weiner

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Weiner v. Weiner

313 A.2d 222, 126 N.J. Super. 155

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedJanuary 8, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 313 A.2d 222 (Weiner v. Weiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weiner v. Weiner, 313 A.2d 222, 126 N.J. Super. 155 (N.J. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

126 N.J. Super. 155 (1974) 313 A.2d 222

ESTELLE M. WEINER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
HOWARD M. WEINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 19, 1973. Decided January 8, 1974.

Before Judges LEONARD, ALLCORN and CRAHAY.

Mr. Howard M. Weiner, appellant-cross-respondent, argued the cause pro se.

Mr. Edward D. McKirdy argued the cause for the respondent-cross-appellant (Messrs. McKirdy and Riskin, P.A., attorneys.)

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Polow.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

126 N.J. Super. 155 (1974) 313 A.2d 222

ESTELLE M. WEINER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
HOWARD M. WEINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 19, 1973. Decided January 8, 1974.

Before Judges LEONARD, ALLCORN and CRAHAY.

Mr. Howard M. Weiner, appellant-cross-respondent, argued the cause pro se.

Mr. Edward D. McKirdy argued the cause for the respondent-cross-appellant (Messrs. McKirdy and Riskin, P.A., attorneys.)

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Polow.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

313 A.2d 222, 126 N.J. Super. 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiner-v-weiner-njsuperctappdiv-1974.

Opinion

ESTELLE M. WEINER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT CROSS-APPELLANT, v. HOWARD M. WEINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

ESTELLE M. WEINER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
HOWARD M. WEINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CROSS-RESPONDENT.