Wein v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

223 A.D. 794
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. The undisputed facts show that plaintiff’s injuries were not caused by any act or omission of defendant, but by the act of the customers in the store, in crowding about the entrance; that the condition was one that could not reasonably have been apprehended; and that defendant is not liable therefor (Woolworth & Co. v. Conboy, 170 Fed. 934; Lord v. Sherer Dry Goods Co., 205 Mass. 1; Madden v. N. Y. Central & H. R. R. R. Co., 98 App. Div. 406.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wein v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 223 A.D. 794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

223 A.D. 794 (Wein v. F. W. Woolworth Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frein v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
204 Misc. 694 (New York Supreme Court, 1953)
Butensky v. Goldberg
240 A.D. 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)