Weiller v. Weiller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weiller v. Weiller

267 A.D.2d 390, 700 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13178

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 267 A.D.2d 390 (Weiller v. Weiller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weiller v. Weiller, 267 A.D.2d 390, 700 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13178 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court article 4, Douglas Weiller appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County [391]*391(Pagones, J.), dated December 30, 1998, which denied his application for blood testing of the parties and their presumptive child to determine the paternity of the child.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see, Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court properly determined that the doctrine of equitable estoppel precludes the appellant from challenging the paternity of the child (see, Fung v Fung, 238 AD2d 375; Matter of Alan N. v Diana N., 213 AD2d 550). O’Brien, J. P. , Sullivan, Goldstein, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court article 4, Douglas Weiller appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County [391]*391(Pagones, J.), dated December 30, 1998, which denied his application for blood testing of the parties and their presumptive child to determine the paternity of the child.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see, Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court properly determined that the doctrine of equitable estoppel precludes the appellant from challenging the paternity of the child (see, Fung v Fung, 238 AD2d 375; Matter of Alan N. v Diana N., 213 AD2d 550). O’Brien, J. P. , Sullivan, Goldstein, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 390, 700 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiller-v-weiller-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack