Alan N. v. Diana N.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alan N. v. Diana N.

213 A.D.2d 550, 624 N.Y.S.2d 909

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 213 A.D.2d 550 (Alan N. v. Diana N.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alan N. v. Diana N., 213 A.D.2d 550, 624 N.Y.S.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated November 3, 1993, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Mandell, H.E.), dated September 9, 1993, denying his application for blood testing of the parties and the child Justin N. to determine the paternity of the child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court properly determined that the doctrine of equitable estoppel precludes the petitioner from challenging the paternity of the child (see, Matter of Barbara A. M. v Gerard J. M., 178 AD2d 412; Vito L. v Filomena L., 172 AD2d 648; Golser v Golser, 115 AD2d 695). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated November 3, 1993, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Mandell, H.E.), dated September 9, 1993, denying his application for blood testing of the parties and the child Justin N. to determine the paternity of the child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court properly determined that the doctrine of equitable estoppel precludes the petitioner from challenging the paternity of the child (see, Matter of Barbara A. M. v Gerard J. M., 178 AD2d 412; Vito L. v Filomena L., 172 AD2d 648; Golser v Golser, 115 AD2d 695). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 550, 624 N.Y.S.2d 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alan-n-v-diana-n-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack