Weigardt v. Becken

118 P.2d 182, 10 Wash. 2d 725
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 18, 1941
DocketNo. 28265.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 118 P.2d 182 (Weigardt v. Becken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weigardt v. Becken, 118 P.2d 182, 10 Wash. 2d 725 (Wash. 1941).

Opinion

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam

Subsequent to the time the decision in this case was filed (8 Wn. (2d) 568, 113 P. (2d) 60), petition for rehearing was granted, and the case was thereafter heard En Banc.

In appellants’ petition for rehearing, it was urged that the judgment of the trial court should be modified by providing for a dismissal of the action without prejudice. The superior court tried the case upon its merits and dismissed the action with prejudice.

The effect of our opinion holding that the complaint did not state a cause of action was to leave the parties in the same position as they were prior to the bringing of the action in the superior court. It is apparent that the judgment of dismissal should be without prejudice to the beginning of another action.

The original opinion is amended to read as follows:

“This case is remanded to the trial court, with instructions to dismiss the action without prejudice.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vilbig Const. Co. v. Whitham
1948 OK 272 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1948)
Wiegardt v. Becken
149 P.2d 929 (Washington Supreme Court, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 P.2d 182, 10 Wash. 2d 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weigardt-v-becken-wash-1941.