Weidenbenner v. Stern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weidenbenner v. Stern

250 A.D.2d 762, 672 N.Y.S.2d 256, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5794

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 250 A.D.2d 762 (Weidenbenner v. Stern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weidenbenner v. Stern, 250 A.D.2d 762, 672 N.Y.S.2d 256, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.), entered June 3, 1997, which granted the motion of the defendant Associated Property Services, Inc., for, inter alia, summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint insofar [763]*763as asserted against the defendant Associated Property Services, Inc. (hereinafter Associated) because, as a matter of law, Associated owed no duty of care to the plaintiff (see, Eaves Costume Co. v Y.B.H. Realty Corp., 76 NY2d 220, 226-227; cf., Palka v Servicemaster Mgt. Servs. Corp., 83 NY2d 579, 584).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.), entered June 3, 1997, which granted the motion of the defendant Associated Property Services, Inc., for, inter alia, summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint insofar [763]*763as asserted against the defendant Associated Property Services, Inc. (hereinafter Associated) because, as a matter of law, Associated owed no duty of care to the plaintiff (see, Eaves Costume Co. v Y.B.H. Realty Corp., 76 NY2d 220, 226-227; cf., Palka v Servicemaster Mgt. Servs. Corp., 83 NY2d 579, 584).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D.2d 762, 672 N.Y.S.2d 256, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weidenbenner-v-stern-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack