Wehling v. Wehling

398 N.W.2d 726, 224 Neb. 515, 1987 Neb. LEXIS 769
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 16, 1987
DocketNo. 85-546
StatusPublished

This text of 398 N.W.2d 726 (Wehling v. Wehling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wehling v. Wehling, 398 N.W.2d 726, 224 Neb. 515, 1987 Neb. LEXIS 769 (Neb. 1987).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Helen Joan Wehling appeals a judgment of the district court dissolving her marriage to Daniel E. Wehling in which the property was divided, but no alimony was awarded. The failure to order alimony and the award of property made are assigned as errors.

We have reviewed the record de novo, as we are required, to determine whether the district court abused its discretion. See Vitosh v. Vitosh, ante p. 196, 397 N.W.2d 35 (1986). Our review leads us to the conclusion that the district court did not abuse its discretion, and therefore its judgment should be affirmed.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vitosh v. Vitosh
397 N.W.2d 35 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
398 N.W.2d 726, 224 Neb. 515, 1987 Neb. LEXIS 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wehling-v-wehling-neb-1987.