Vitosh v. Vitosh

397 N.W.2d 35, 224 Neb. 196, 1986 Neb. LEXIS 1161
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 5, 1986
Docket86-072
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 397 N.W.2d 35 (Vitosh v. Vitosh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vitosh v. Vitosh, 397 N.W.2d 35, 224 Neb. 196, 1986 Neb. LEXIS 1161 (Neb. 1986).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Michael D. Vitosh appeals a judgment of the district court for Gage County authorizing his former wife, Clara, to remove their daughter from the state and denying his application for a reduction in child support.

We have reviewed the record de novo, as we are required, to determine whether the district court abused its discretion. See, Maack v. Maack, 223 Neb. 342, 389 N.W.2d 318 (1986); Meyers v. Meyers, 222 Neb. 370, 383 N.W.2d 784 (1986). Our review leads us to the conclusion that the district court did not abuse its discretion, and therefore the judgment entered by the district court should be affirmed.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wehling v. Wehling
398 N.W.2d 726 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
397 N.W.2d 35, 224 Neb. 196, 1986 Neb. LEXIS 1161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vitosh-v-vitosh-neb-1986.