Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/WEHDE v. Lansing

WEHDE v. Lansing

356 S.W.3d 208, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1324, 2011 WL 4862954
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 11, 2011
DocketED 96142
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 356 S.W.3d 208 (WEHDE v. Lansing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
WEHDE v. Lansing, 356 S.W.3d 208, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1324, 2011 WL 4862954 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

*209 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Lansing appeals the judgment in favor of Thomas P. Wehde, Sarah E. Weh-de, and Thomas Schulte (collectively “Plaintiffs”) on their claim for breach of contract. We find that the trial court did not err in finding Lansing breached the contract. We also find the trial court did not err in awarding Plaintiffs damages and attorney’s fees.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Rice
356 S.W.3d 208 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 S.W.3d 208, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1324, 2011 WL 4862954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wehde-v-lansing-moctapp-2011.