WEHDE v. Lansing

356 S.W.3d 208, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1324, 2011 WL 4862954

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Lansing appeals the judgment in favor of Thomas P. Wehde, Sarah E. Weh-de, and Thomas Schulte (collectively “Plaintiffs”) on their claim for breach of contract. We find that the trial court did not err in finding Lansing breached the contract. We also find the trial court did not err in awarding Plaintiffs damages and attorney’s fees.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).