State v. Rice

356 S.W.3d 208, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1318, 2011 WL 4790761
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 11, 2011·No. ED 95815·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earl G. Rice, Jr., (Defendant) appeals from the judgment convicting him of Speeding and Driving While License Revoked (DWLR), in violation of Section 302.321, RSMo 2000. 1 We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rice, 356 S.W.3d 208, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1318, 2011 WL 4790761 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

356 S.W.3d 208 (State v. Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

WEHDE v. Lansing
356 S.W.3d 208 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)