Wegman v. Wegman

343 N.E.2d 288, 37 N.Y.2d 940, 380 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2342
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 19, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 343 N.E.2d 288 (Wegman v. Wegman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wegman v. Wegman, 343 N.E.2d 288, 37 N.Y.2d 940, 380 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2342 (N.Y. 1975).

Opinion

Memorandum. Since the defendant alleged in her counterclaim that she was suffering from certain specified ailments in addition to general poor health, her "physical condition” was "in controversy” within the meaning of CPLR 3121 and the plaintiff was entitled to request a physical examination. CPLR 3121 does not prohibit such examinations in matrimonial actions, and although we recognize the potential for abuse in these cases, the court’s broad discretionary power to grant a protective order "to prevent unreasonable annoyance, expense, embarrassment, disadvantage, or other prejudice to any person or the courts” (CPLR 3103) should provide adequate safeguards.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

B.S. v. B.F.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
VISCUSO, ANGELO M. v. VISCUSO, SUSAN M.
129 A.D.3d 1679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Worysz v. Ratel
101 A.D.3d 893 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Ravnikar v. Skyline Credit-Ride, Inc.
79 A.D.3d 1118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
A.L. v. C.K.
21 Misc. 3d 933 (New York Supreme Court, 2008)
Torelli v. Torelli
50 A.D.3d 1125 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Matter of Dominick R. v. Jean R.
2005 NY Slip Op 50776(U) (Kings Family Court, 2005)
Ochs v. Ochs
193 Misc. 2d 502 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)
Eber Bros. Wine & Liquor Corp. v. Ribowsky
266 A.D.2d 499 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Annexstein v. Annexstein
202 A.D.2d 1060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Garvin v. Garvin
162 A.D.2d 497 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Burgel v. Burgel
141 A.D.2d 215 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Perretta v. Perretta
140 A.D.2d 681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Anne D. v. Raymond D.
139 Misc. 2d 718 (New York Supreme Court, 1988)
B. v. B.
134 Misc. 2d 487 (NYC Family Court, 1987)
Lohmiller v. Lohmiller
118 A.D.2d 760 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Hirschfeld v. Hirschfeld
114 A.D.2d 1006 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Rosenblitt v. Rosenblitt
107 A.D.2d 292 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Proschold v. Proschold
114 Misc. 2d 568 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
Rembert v. Lipshutz
87 A.D.2d 1004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 N.E.2d 288, 37 N.Y.2d 940, 380 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wegman-v-wegman-ny-1975.