Weems v. State

627 So. 2d 575, 1993 WL 496049
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 1, 1993
Docket93-03769
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 627 So. 2d 575 (Weems v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weems v. State, 627 So. 2d 575, 1993 WL 496049 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

627 So.2d 575 (1993)

Kevin L. WEEMS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 93-03769.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 1, 1993.

PARKER, Judge.

Kevin L. Weems appeals from a summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Weems alleged in his motion that the trial court had not properly credited the time he spent in jail prior to sentencing. Specifically, Weems alleged that he was incarcerated in the Hillsborough County Jail from April 24, 1991, until March 17, 1992, and was entitled to 328 days credit for time spent in the jail toward his sentence which the trial court imposed on March 17, 1992. Weems contended that the trial court awarded him only sixty-two days credit for jail time served prior to sentencing.

The trial court denied the motion, finding that Weems's claim for 328 days jail credit was not substantiated by the court's records. The trial court attached a computer-generated case progress print-out which reflected, among other things, Weems's charges, sentencing date, sentence, and jail time credit. However, the trial court's order denying relief must include attachments which refute Weems's allegations that he was incarcerated from April 24, 1991, to March 17, 1992. See Phelps v. State, 561 So.2d 32 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

We reverse the summary denial of Weems's motion and remand this matter to the trial court. If the trial court should summarily deny the motion again, it shall attach such portions of the record which conclusively refute the allegations of Weems. Any party aggrieved by the subsequent action of the trial court must file a notice of appeal within thirty days to obtain appellate review.

Reversed and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
693 So. 2d 624 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Turner v. State
667 So. 2d 882 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Gibson v. State
642 So. 2d 43 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Davenport v. State
640 So. 2d 1225 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
627 So. 2d 575, 1993 WL 496049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weems-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.