Weeks v. City of Newark
168 A.2d 11, 34 N.J. 250, 1961 N.J. LEXIS 210
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Goldmann in the court below.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weinteaub, and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Hall and Schettino—6.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weeks v. City of Newark, 168 A.2d 11, 34 N.J. 250, 1961 N.J. LEXIS 210 (N.J. 1961).
168 A.2d 11 (Weeks v. City of Newark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit Operations
563 N.W.2d 309 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1997)
Janklow v. Minnesota Board of Examiners for Nursing Home Administrators
552 N.W.2d 711 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1996)
Wilson Coalition v. Mayor of Summit
586 A.2d 346 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)
Van Ness v. Borough of Deal
367 A.2d 1191 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Kent v. County of Hudson
245 A.2d 747 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
Coleman v. Edison Tp.
232 A.2d 187 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Jackson v. Hankinson
229 A.2d 267 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Wall v. Hudson County Park Commission
193 A.2d 857 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1963)
Becker v. Newark
178 A.2d 364 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Stringfield v. City of Hackensack
171 A.2d 361 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Hayden v. Curley
169 A.2d 809 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1961)