Weeks v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.

90 S.E. 141, 172 N.C. 869, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 432
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 11, 1916·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was tried iu accordance with the opinion upon former appeal, and as the jury has, upon competent evidence, found the contract as contended for by the plaintiff, the judgment must be affirmed.

No error.

Brown, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weeks v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co., 90 S.E. 141, 172 N.C. 869, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 432 (N.C. 1916).

90 S.E. 141 (Weeks v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gibson v. Campbell
222 S.E.2d 449 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)
White v. . Comrs. of Johnston
7 S.E.2d 825 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Brown v. Southern Railway Co.
162 S.E. 613 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)