Webster v. Webster

58 N.H. 3
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1876
StatusPublished

This text of 58 N.H. 3 (Webster v. Webster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Webster v. Webster, 58 N.H. 3 (N.H. 1876).

Opinion

Sawyer, J.

The plaintiff was incapable of contracting a valid marriage with Webster in 1855, because she then had a husband living from whom she was not divorced. Mass. Rev. St., c. 75, s. 4 (Gen. St., c. 106, s. 4); c. 76, s. 1 (Gen. St., c. 107, s. 1). The exemption from the criminal punishment of polygamy in certain cases (Mass. Rev. St., c. 130, ss. 2, 3; Gen. St., c. 165, ss. 4, 5) does not render the second marriage valid. Kenley v. Kenley, 2 Yeates 207; Fenton v. Reed, 4 Johns. 52; Williamson v. Parisien, 1 Johns. Ch. 389; Glass v. Glass, 114 Mass. 563; 2 Kent Com. 79. It is not necessary to consider whether Hiram v. Pierce, 45 Me. 367, gives the true construction of that provision of the Massachusetts statutes, by which, under some circumstances, the issue of the second marriage is “ deemed to be the legitimate issue of the parent capable of contracting the marriage.” The plaintiff is not the widow of Webster.

Case discharged.

Foster, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Inhabitants of Hiram v. Pierce
45 Me. 367 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1858)
Fenton v. Reed
4 Johns. 52 (New York Supreme Court, 1809)
Williamson v. Parisien
1 Johns. Ch. 389 (New York Court of Chancery, 1815)
Glass v. Glass
114 Mass. 563 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1874)
Kenley v. Kenley
2 Yeates 207 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1797)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 N.H. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webster-v-webster-nh-1876.