Kenley v. Kenley
2 Yeates 207
Opinion
The following case was stated to the court, on a libel for a divorce from tlie bonds of matrimony.
Whether the last marriage was illegal, was now submitted to the court without argument, by Mr. Rawle for the libellant Mr. S. levy for the defendant.
The court said, that though the circumstances attending this case might exempt the defendant from the pains of bigamy, yet her first husband being in full life, and their marriage not annulled by any competent jurisdiction, the marriage was ipso facto void and null.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kenley v. Kenley, 2 Yeates 207 (Pa. 1797).
2 Yeates 207 (Kenley v. Kenley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bordone, R. v. Bordone, V.
2025 Pa. Super. 205 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2025)
Smith v. Mid-States Equipment Service, Inc.
27 Pa. D. & C.2d 143 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1962)
Commonwealth v. Clauges
19 Pa. D. & C. 643 (Delaware County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1933)
Commonwealth v. White
22 Pa. Super. 67 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)
Klaas v. Klaas
14 Pa. Super. 550 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)
Thomas v. Thomas
17 A. 182 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1889)
Webster v. Webster
58 N.H. 3 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1876)
Glass v. Glass
114 Mass. 563 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1874)