Webster v. Wade
This text of 19 Cal. 291 (Webster v. Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Baldwin, J. and Cope, J. concurring.
The law is well settled, that where a contract for service is made for a fixed period, if the employer discharge the servant before its termination without good cause, he is still liable, and the servant may recover the stipulated wages. In the present case, the steamer upon which Collins was employed as steward was laid up by the defendant in pursuance of a contract made by him to that effect with other parties; but the defendant did not notify Collins that he should no longer employ him, and Collins continued at all times ready t.o perform the service required by the contract. The mere laying up of the steamer did not of course terminate the relation of the defendant as employer, or release him from his obligations to the steward. And even had he discharged the steward, his liability would have continued, there having been no good cause arising from the latter’s conduct for the proceeding. There is no merit in the appeal, and the judgment is affirmed with ten per cent, damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Cal. 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webster-v-wade-cal-1861.