Webster-Brinkley Co. v. Belfield
This text of 166 F.2d 814 (Webster-Brinkley Co. v. Belfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from a judgment obtained by appellee, Thomas R. Belfield, against ap^ pellant, Webster-Brinkley Company, in an action by appellee and John G. Foster against appellant under §§ 7(a) and 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 207(a) and 216(b). The judgment was for $4,347.40 ($2,173.70 as unpaid overtime compensation and an additional equal amount as liquidated damages), with attorneys’ fees and costs.
The case was tried by the court without a jury. One of the issues was whether appellee, while employed by appellant, was or was not an employee in a bona fide executive or administrative capacity.1 On this issue, the trial court did not make any finding. It should have done so.2
This appeal was taken prior to the enactment of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 251-262. The trial court, therefore, had no opportunity to exercise the discretion vested in it by § 11 of the Portal-to-Portal Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 260. We think it should have such an opportunity.3
[815]*815Judgment vacated and case remanded with directions to (1) make and file findings on all factual issues, including the issue mentioned above; (2) take such action, if any, as the court deems proper under § 11 of the Portal-to-Portal Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 260; and (3) enter such judgment as it deems proper.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 F.2d 814, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 3060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webster-brinkley-co-v-belfield-ca9-1948.