Webster Bank v. Zak
This text of 763 A.2d 1090 (Webster Bank v. Zak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
The judgment of the trial court in this case must be reversed and the case remanded for the purpose of making factual findings to determine whether the defendant MFR of East Hampton, LLC, has standing to assert its claim to an interest in the property under foreclosure and to otherwise participate in the proceedings. We retain jurisdiction over this appeal for purposes of any further appellate proceedings, without the necessity of filing another appeal.
The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
763 A.2d 1090, 61 Conn. App. 402, 2001 Conn. App. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webster-bank-v-zak-connappct-2001.