Webster Bank v. Zak

Connecticut Appellate Court

Webster Bank v. Zak

763 A.2d 1090, 61 Conn. App. 402, 2001 Conn. App. LEXIS 23

Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided January 16, 2001·No. AC 20906·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court in this case must be reversed and the case remanded for the purpose of making factual findings to determine whether the defendant MFR of East Hampton, LLC, has standing to assert its claim to an interest in the property under foreclosure and to otherwise participate in the proceedings. We retain jurisdiction over this appeal for purposes of any further appellate proceedings, without the necessity of filing another appeal.

The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court in this case must be reversed and the case remanded for the purpose of making factual findings to determine whether the defendant MFR of East Hampton, LLC, has standing to assert its claim to an interest in the property under foreclosure and to otherwise participate in the proceedings. We retain jurisdiction over this appeal for purposes of any further appellate proceedings, without the necessity of filing another appeal.

The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Webster Bank v. Zak, 763 A.2d 1090, 61 Conn. App. 402, 2001 Conn. App. LEXIS 23 (Colo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

763 A.2d 1090 (Webster Bank v. Zak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related