Webster Bank v. Zak

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Webster Bank v. Zak

769 A.2d 61, 255 Conn. 946, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 81

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 28, 2001·No. SC 16489·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant MFR of East Hampton, LLC’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 61 Conn. App. 402 (AC 20906), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for factual findings regarding the standing of the defendant MFR of East Hampton, LLC?”

SULLIVAN, C. J., and ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

[947]*947The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16489. Kerry M. Wisser and Nathan A. Schatz, in support of the petition. Jeffrey T. Beatty, in opposition. Decided February 28, 2001

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant MFR of East Hampton, LLC’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 61 Conn. App. 402 (AC 20906), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for factual findings regarding the standing of the defendant MFR of East Hampton, LLC?”

SULLIVAN, C. J., and ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

[947]*947The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16489. Kerry M. Wisser and Nathan A. Schatz, in support of the petition. Jeffrey T. Beatty, in opposition. Decided February 28, 2001

Webster Bank v. Zak, 769 A.2d 61, 255 Conn. 946, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 81 (Colo. 2001).

Pincite

769 A.2d 61 (Webster Bank v. Zak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related