Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Webber v. City of Dunkirk

Webber v. City of Dunkirk

226 A.D.2d 1052, 642 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5502
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 19, 1996
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 226 A.D.2d 1052 (Webber v. City of Dunkirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Webber v. City of Dunkirk, 226 A.D.2d 1052, 642 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5502 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Order affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Webber v City of Dunkirk (226 AD2d 1050 [decided herewith]).

All concur except Lawton and Balio, JJ., who dissent in part and vote to modify in the same dissenting Memorandum as in Webber v City of Dunkirk (226 AD2d 1050, 1051 [decided herewith]). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J.—Labor Law.) Present—Denman, P. J., Law-ton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Webber v. City of Dunkirk
226 A.D.2d 1050 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 A.D.2d 1052, 642 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webber-v-city-of-dunkirk-nyappdiv-1996.