Webb v. State
320 S.W.3d 219, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1284, 2010 WL 3812644
Opinion
ORDER
Kevin Webb appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memoran *220 dum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Webb v. State, 320 S.W.3d 219, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1284, 2010 WL 3812644 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
320 S.W.3d 219 (Webb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ballard v. Hudson
320 S.W.3d 219 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)