Ballard v. Hudson

320 S.W.3d 219, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1287, 2010 WL 3812606
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 7, 2010·No. WD 70755·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellants Bruce W. Ballard, et al. appeal the Boone County Circuit Court’s grant of a directed verdict at the close of opening statements in favor of defendants Milbre Burch, Berkely Hudson, and Oak-stone Construction Company. Ballard argues that the facts he recited during opening statement were sufficient to establish submissible claims of negligence and trespass against the defendants, and that the trial court erroneously excluded the testimony of one of his expert witnesses. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ballard v. Hudson, 320 S.W.3d 219, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1287, 2010 WL 3812606 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

320 S.W.3d 219 (Ballard v. Hudson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Webb v. State
320 S.W.3d 219 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)