Weavering v. Schneider

44 Cal. App. 587
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Weavering v. Schneider. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 Cal. App. 181
California Court of Appeal·Decided December 4, 1919·No. Civ. No. 3079·Published

Opinion

WOOD, J.,

pro tem.—This is an appeal from an order appointing a receiver. [1] Upon the calling of the case in this court there was presented a certified copy of a stipulation [588]*588of the parties filed in. the superior court. It appears from an examination of this stipulation that the appellant and respondent have agreed to an immediate sale by the receiver of all the property in his hands, and for a disposal of the proceeds of the sale and of all other property belonging to the copartnership existing between the parties to the action. It follows that there is now no actual controversy between the parties.

It was held in Nelson v. Nelson, 153 Cal. 204, [94 Pac. 880], that where an appeal no longer involves the determination of adversary rights, the questions presented would not be considered, even for the purpose of deciding who should pay costs on appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

Kerrigan, J., and Waste, P. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weavering v. Schneider, 44 Cal. App. 587 (Cal. Ct. App. 1919).

44 Cal. App. 587 (Weavering v. Schneider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nelson v. Nelson
94 P. 880 (California Supreme Court, 1908)