Weaver v. United Insurance Co. of America

270 So. 2d 404, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5762
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 1972·No. No. 72-583·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Bergh v. Canadian Universal Ins. Co., Fla.1968, 216 So.2d 436; Columbia Casualty Co. v. Zimmerman, Fla. 1952, 62 So.2d 338; New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Intercity Supply Corp., Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 110; State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Couch, Fla.App. 1964, 167 So.2d 786, cert. denied, Fla., 173 So.2d 146.

[405]*405This affirmation is only as to the propriety of the dismissal of the complaint for declaratory decree and is without prejudice to the plaintiff to seek appropriate relief for damages, if there be any, or for other relief which may be appropriate. Cf. Hunter v. Holtman, Fla.App.1970, 233 So. 2d 197; Swain v. Reliable Ins. Co., Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 862.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weaver v. United Insurance Co. of America, 270 So. 2d 404, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5762 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

270 So. 2d 404 (Weaver v. United Insurance Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. Intercity Supply Corp.
212 So. 2d 110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Bergh v. Canadian Universal Insurance Company
216 So. 2d 436 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
Columbia Casualty Co. v. Zimmerman
62 So. 2d 338 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
Swain v. Reliable Insurance Company
200 So. 2d 862 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Couch
167 So. 2d 786 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Hunter v. Holtman
233 So. 2d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)