Hunter v. Holtman
This text of 233 So. 2d 197 (Hunter v. Holtman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff below has appealed from orders of the trial court.
We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that the orders on appeal must be affirmed. See Florida Hotel and Restaurant Commission v. Marseilles Hotel Co., Fla. 1956, 84 So.2d 567; Halpert v. Olesky, Fla. 1953, 65 So.2d 762; M & E Land Co. v. Seigel, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 769; [198]*198and State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Couch, Fla.App. 1964, 167 So.2d 786.
This affirmance is only as to the propriety of the dismissal of the complaint for declaratory decree and the order compelling plaintiffs to remove themselves from the premises and is. without prejudice to the plaintiff to seek appropriate relief for damages, if any there be, or for other relief which may be appropriate. Cf. Swain v. Reliable Insurance Company, Fla.App. 1967, 200 So.2d 862.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 So. 2d 197, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-holtman-fladistctapp-1970.