Hunter v. Holtman

233 So. 2d 197, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6657
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 3, 1970·No. No. 69-847·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff below has appealed from orders of the trial court.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that the orders on appeal must be affirmed. See Florida Hotel and Restaurant Commission v. Marseilles Hotel Co., Fla. 1956, 84 So.2d 567; Halpert v. Olesky, Fla. 1953, 65 So.2d 762; M & E Land Co. v. Seigel, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 769; [198] and State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Couch, Fla.App. 1964, 167 So.2d 786.

This affirmance is only as to the propriety of the dismissal of the complaint for declaratory decree and the order compelling plaintiffs to remove themselves from the premises and is. without prejudice to the plaintiff to seek appropriate relief for damages, if any there be, or for other relief which may be appropriate. Cf. Swain v. Reliable Insurance Company, Fla.App. 1967, 200 So.2d 862.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunter v. Holtman, 233 So. 2d 197, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6657 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

233 So. 2d 197 (Hunter v. Holtman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weaver v. United Insurance Co. of America
270 So. 2d 404 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)