Weaver v. State

672 So. 2d 88, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3899, 1996 WL 185651
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Weaver v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12194
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 1996·No. No. 95-3822·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although afforded an opportunity to do so, appellant has elected not to file a brief in proper person. Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation, and the sentence imposed.. However, we note that it does not appear that a written order was entered revoking appellant’s probation. On remand, the trial court is directed to enter a written order, consistent with its oral pronouncement, revoking appellant’s probation.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weaver v. State, 672 So. 2d 88, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3899, 1996 WL 185651 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

672 So. 2d 88 (Weaver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)