Weaver v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Weaver v. State

672 So. 2d 88, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3899, 1996 WL 185651

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 19, 1996

DocketNo. 95-3822

StatusPublished

This text of 672 So. 2d 88 (Weaver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weaver v. State, 672 So. 2d 88, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3899, 1996 WL 185651 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although afforded an opportunity to do so, appellant has elected not to file a brief in proper person. Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation, and the sentence imposed.. However, we note that it does not appear that a written order was entered revoking appellant’s probation. On remand, the trial court is directed to enter a written order, consistent with its oral pronouncement, revoking appellant’s probation.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although afforded an opportunity to do so, appellant has elected not to file a brief in proper person. Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation, and the sentence imposed.. However, we note that it does not appear that a written order was entered revoking appellant’s probation. On remand, the trial court is directed to enter a written order, consistent with its oral pronouncement, revoking appellant’s probation.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

672 So. 2d 88, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3899, 1996 WL 185651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weaver-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack