Weaver v. State

145 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 695
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 17, 1933
Docket6 Div. 290.
StatusPublished

This text of 145 So. 926 (Weaver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weaver v. State, 145 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 695 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted of grand larceny, and he appeals.

The evidence in this case presents a jury question. From the facts proven and the legal inferences to be drawn therefrom, the evidence is sufficient to' support the verdict of grand larceny.

While there are some objections and exceptions reserved to questions propounded to witnesses, there are none of these' calling for serious consideration. The answers would not affect the result one way or the other.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weaver-v-state-alactapp-1933.