Weaver v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Weaver v. State

145 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 695

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Weaver v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ala. App. 208 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 17, 1933·No. 6 Div. 290.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted of grand larceny, and he appeals.

The evidence in this case presents a jury question. From the facts proven and the legal inferences to be drawn therefrom, the evidence is sufficient to' support the verdict of grand larceny.

While there are some objections and exceptions reserved to questions propounded to witnesses, there are none of these' calling for serious consideration. The answers would not affect the result one way or the other.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted of grand larceny, and he appeals.

The evidence in this case presents a jury question. From the facts proven and the legal inferences to be drawn therefrom, the evidence is sufficient to' support the verdict of grand larceny.

While there are some objections and exceptions reserved to questions propounded to witnesses, there are none of these' calling for serious consideration. The answers would not affect the result one way or the other.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Weaver v. State, 145 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 695 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

145 So. 926 (Weaver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.