Weaver v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Weaver v. State

125 So. 801, 23 Ala. App. 353

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 14, 1930

Docket1 Div. 866.

StatusPublished

This text of 125 So. 801 (Weaver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weaver v. State, 125 So. 801, 23 Ala. App. 353 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction, in the Mobile circuit court, for the offense of transporting in quantities of five gallons or more of liquors or beverages, the sale, possession, or transportation of which is prohibited by law in this State.

Upon examination we find this ease is similar in all respects to the case against this same appellant (1 Div. 868, Weaver v. State, 125 So. 800), 1 decided by this court on December 7,1929, and affirmed. The propositions of law involved, and the points of decision presented, appear to be identical in these two eases. This court having finally passed upon *354 all these matters in the former ease, there is no1 reason why we should again write to these questions. . The judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is affirmed here, upon authority of Weaver v. State (Ala. App.) supra.

Affirmed.

1

Ante, p. 353.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction, in the Mobile circuit court, for the offense of transporting in quantities of five gallons or more of liquors or beverages, the sale, possession, or transportation of which is prohibited by law in this State.

Upon examination we find this ease is similar in all respects to the case against this same appellant (1 Div. 868, Weaver v. State, 125 So. 800), 1 decided by this court on December 7,1929, and affirmed. The propositions of law involved, and the points of decision presented, appear to be identical in these two eases. This court having finally passed upon *354 all these matters in the former ease, there is no1 reason why we should again write to these questions. . The judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is affirmed here, upon authority of Weaver v. State (Ala. App.) supra.

Affirmed.

1

Ante, p. 353.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 So. 801, 23 Ala. App. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weaver-v-state-alactapp-1930.