Weaver v. State
131 So. 927, 24 Ala. App. 694
Opinion
The evidence in this case has been read by the court sitting en banc, and in it there is to be found no sufficient evidence connecting this defendant with the possession of -the prohibited liquor. A constructive possession is not sufficient; there must be coupled with such possession evidence tending to prove a guilty scienter. Huckabaa v. State, 23 Ala. App. 333, 125 So. 202.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weaver v. State, 131 So. 927, 24 Ala. App. 694 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).
131 So. 927 (Weaver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walls v. State
198 So. 151 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1940)
Thurman v. State
196 So. 748 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1940)