Weaver v. Lancaster Newspapers Inc.

895 A.2d 527
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Weaver v. Lancaster Newspapers Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 592 Pa. 458
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 4, 2006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the question of whether, under this Court’s decision in O’Donnell v. Philadelphia Record Co., 356 Pa. 307, 51 A.2d 775 (1947), Respondent Brownsteiris alleged actions in granting permission, in the post-complaint timeframe, to a third party to republish the disputed letter to the editor, con[528]*528stitutes sufficient circumstantial evidence of actual malice for the cause of action against Respondent Brownstein to survive his motion for summary judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weaver v. Lancaster Newspapers Inc., 895 A.2d 527 (Pa. 2006).

895 A.2d 527 (Weaver v. Lancaster Newspapers Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Donnell v. Philadelphia Record Co.
51 A.2d 775 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)