Weaver v. Lancaster Newspapers Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Weaver v. Lancaster Newspapers Inc.

895 A.2d 527

DecidedApril 4, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 895 A.2d 527 (Weaver v. Lancaster Newspapers Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weaver v. Lancaster Newspapers Inc., 895 A.2d 527 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the question of whether, under this Court’s decision in O’Donnell v. Philadelphia Record Co., 356 Pa. 307, 51 A.2d 775 (1947), Respondent Brownsteiris alleged actions in granting permission, in the post-complaint timeframe, to a third party to republish the disputed letter to the editor, con[528]*528stitutes sufficient circumstantial evidence of actual malice for the cause of action against Respondent Brownstein to survive his motion for summary judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the question of whether, under this Court’s decision in O’Donnell v. Philadelphia Record Co., 356 Pa. 307, 51 A.2d 775 (1947), Respondent Brownsteiris alleged actions in granting permission, in the post-complaint timeframe, to a third party to republish the disputed letter to the editor, con[528]*528stitutes sufficient circumstantial evidence of actual malice for the cause of action against Respondent Brownstein to survive his motion for summary judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

895 A.2d 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weaver-v-lancaster-newspapers-inc-pa-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack