Weathers v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Weathers v. State

92 S.E. 552, 20 Ga. App. 71, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 714

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Weathers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ga. App. 363 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 11, 1917·No. 7883·Published

Opinion

{Vade, C. J.

1. This case is controlled in principle by the decision-in Davis v. State, ante, 68 (92 S. E. 550). The demurrer was properly overruled, but the evidence did not authorize the verdict. The trial judge therefore erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

2. In view of the foregoing ruling, it is unnecessary to refer to the various special assignments of error.

Judgment reversed.

George and Luhe, JJ., concur. Moore & Pomeroy, G. M. Dobbs, J. J. Garland, Little, Powell, Smith' & Goldstein, for plaintiff in error. Herbert Glay, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{Vade, C. J.

1. This case is controlled in principle by the decision-in Davis v. State, ante, 68 (92 S. E. 550). The demurrer was properly overruled, but the evidence did not authorize the verdict. The trial judge therefore erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

2. In view of the foregoing ruling, it is unnecessary to refer to the various special assignments of error.

Judgment reversed.

George and Luhe, JJ., concur. Moore & Pomeroy, G. M. Dobbs, J. J. Garland, Little, Powell, Smith' & Goldstein, for plaintiff in error. Herbert Glay, solicitor-general, contra.

Weathers v. State, 92 S.E. 552, 20 Ga. App. 71, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 714 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

92 S.E. 552 (Weathers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related