Weathers v. State
100 S.E. 768, 24 Ga. App. 363, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 665
Opinion
1. Where the president of a bank, by reason of his official position with it, embezzles its funds by drawing them by checks issued in another county, the venue of the crime is not’ improperly laid in the county in which the bank is situated. See Mangham v. State, 11 Ga. App. 427 (2), 436 (75 S. E. 512); Rose v. State, 4 Ga. App. 588 (62 S. E. 117).
2. The evidence in this case authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and for no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weathers v. State, 100 S.E. 768, 24 Ga. App. 363, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 665 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
100 S.E. 768 (Weathers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Overcash v. State
111 Ga. App. 549 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Rawlins v. State
28 S.E.2d 350 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
State v. Grandbouche
230 P. 338 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1924)