Weathered v. Bray

7 Ind. 706
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided June 19, 1856·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case the record does not purport to contain all the evidence. Meeker v. Patty, 6 Ind. 467. And, further, a motion in arrest of judgment was made before the motion for a new trial. The motion in arrest was an affirmance of the verdict. McKinney v. Springer, 6 Ind. R. 453.—Doe v. Clark, id. 466.

It should be mentioned that the defendant offered to prove that he had made another way in which travel could pass; but that was no justification for obstructing the legal highway. A man has not a right to close and open highways according to his own fancy.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weathered v. Bray, 7 Ind. 706 (Ind. 1856).

7 Ind. 706 (Weathered v. Bray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grider v. Scharf
73 N.E.2d 75 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1947)
Kirschbaum v. State
149 N.E. 77 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1925)
Huffman v. State
52 N.E. 713 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1899)
Holcraft v. King
25 Ind. 352 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1865)