Wearing v. Gate Concrete

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 19, 2005·No. 04-2382·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2382

ABRAHAM WEARING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GATE CONCRETE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-02-687-5-BO)

Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 19, 2005

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abraham Wearing, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Kline Dorminey, WIMBERLY, LAWSON, STECKEL, NELSON & SCHNEIDER, Atlanta, Georgia, Melegia Lee Daniels, Jr., WIMBERLY, LAWSON, DANIELS & BRANDON LLC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Abraham Wearing appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment for Gate Concrete and dismissing his

employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Wearing v. Gate Concrete, No.

CA-02-687-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wearing v. Gate Concrete, (4th Cir. 2005).

Wearing v. Gate Concrete (Wearing v. Gate Concrete) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.