Wearing v. Gate Concrete
This text of Wearing v. Gate Concrete (Wearing v. Gate Concrete) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2382
ABRAHAM WEARING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GATE CONCRETE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-02-687-5-BO)
Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 19, 2005
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Abraham Wearing, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Kline Dorminey, WIMBERLY, LAWSON, STECKEL, NELSON & SCHNEIDER, Atlanta, Georgia, Melegia Lee Daniels, Jr., WIMBERLY, LAWSON, DANIELS & BRANDON LLC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Abraham Wearing appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment for Gate Concrete and dismissing his
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Wearing v. Gate Concrete, No.
CA-02-687-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wearing v. Gate Concrete, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wearing-v-gate-concrete-ca4-2005.