Wearing v. Gate Concrete

Fourth Circuit

Wearing v. Gate Concrete

126 F. App'x 126

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 19, 2005·No. No. 04-2382·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Abraham Wearing appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Gate Concrete and dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wearing v. Gate Concrete, No. CA-02-687-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2004). We [127]*127dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Abraham Wearing appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Gate Concrete and dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wearing v. Gate Concrete, No. CA-02-687-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2004). We [127]*127dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Wearing v. Gate Concrete, 126 F. App'x 126 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

126 F. App'x 126 (Wearing v. Gate Concrete) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.