Weakley County Road Commissioners v. Illinois Central Railroad

123 Tenn. 257
Tennessee Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1910·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This is an appeal in error from the judgment of the trial'judge, who disposed of the case without the. intervention of a jury. Ho motion for a new trial was made in the court below.

In Railroad v. Johnson, 114 Tenn., 632, 88 S. W., 169, there was an intimation of our dissatisfaction with- the earlier holding that in such a case a motion for a new trial was not necessary. Since then it has been held that it is essential. This harmonizes the practice in all cases coming to this court from the common-law courts.

Judgment affirmed..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weakley County Road Commissioners v. Illinois Central Railroad, 123 Tenn. 257 (Tenn. 1910).

123 Tenn. 257 (Weakley County Road Commissioners v. Illinois Central Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Burton
72 S.W.2d 778 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1934)
State Ex Rel. Daugherty v. Rose
71 S.W.2d 685 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1934)
Redding v. Hatcher
14 Tenn. App. 561 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1932)
Southern Railway Co. v. City of Elizabethton
10 Tenn. App. 119 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1929)
Guy v. Stemberg-Rainey Hardware Co.
5 Tenn. App. 581 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1927)
Rogers v. Colville
145 Tenn. 650 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1921)
Shelton v. Wade
139 Tenn. 685 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1917)
Bostick v. Thomas
137 Tenn. 99 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1916)