Wayne v. Johnson

Ninth Circuit

Wayne v. Johnson

48 F. App'x 679

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 11, 2002

DocketNo. 02-35393; D.C. No. CY-02-05146-FDB

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 48 F. App'x 679 (Wayne v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wayne v. Johnson, 48 F. App'x 679 (9th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Kenneth Wayne appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of standing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging police officers and various local officials violated Thomas and Samuel New-combs’ constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal for lack of standing. Johns v. County of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 876 (9th Cir.1997). We affirm.

A power of attorney does not confer standing to assert another party’s constitutional claims or authority to represent another party in court. See id. Therefore, the district court properly dismissed for lack of standing.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM

**

Kenneth Wayne appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of standing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging police officers and various local officials violated Thomas and Samuel New-combs’ constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal for lack of standing. Johns v. County of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 876 (9th Cir.1997). We affirm.

A power of attorney does not confer standing to assert another party’s constitutional claims or authority to represent another party in court. See id. Therefore, the district court properly dismissed for lack of standing.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F. App'x 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wayne-v-johnson-ca9-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack