Wayne v. Johnson

48 F. App'x 679
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 11, 2002·No. No. 02-35393; D.C. No. CY-02-05146-FDB·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM**

Kenneth Wayne appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of standing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging police officers and various local officials violated Thomas and Samuel New-combs’ constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal for lack of standing. Johns v. County of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 876 (9th Cir.1997). We affirm.

A power of attorney does not confer standing to assert another party’s constitutional claims or authority to represent another party in court. See id. Therefore, the district court properly dismissed for lack of standing.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wayne v. Johnson, 48 F. App'x 679 (9th Cir. 2002).

48 F. App'x 679 (Wayne v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
D. Idaho, 2026
(PC) Turner v. Adams
E.D. California, 2021