Wayne Jackson v. Trump
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JESSE MICHAEL WAYNE JACKSON, also known as Artemis Adams Anderson Andersen, Plaintiff, 24cv1433 (LTS) -against- CIVIL JUDGMENT DONALD J. TRUMP; MAGA LLC; PROUDBOYS; OATHKEEPERS, Defendants. For the reasons stated in the October 21, 2024, order, this action is dismissed. Plaintiff’s complaint, filed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 25, 2024 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wayne Jackson v. Trump (Wayne Jackson v. Trump) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.