Wayne Investment Corp. v. Abbott

215 N.E.2d 795, 350 Mass. 775
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 31, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by31 cases

This text of 215 N.E.2d 795 (Wayne Investment Corp. v. Abbott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wayne Investment Corp. v. Abbott, 215 N.E.2d 795, 350 Mass. 775 (Mass. 1966).

Opinion

The plaintiff mortgagee prevailed in the District Court, and, on appeal by the defendant mortgagors, in the Superior Court, in summary process to obtain possession of premises purchased by the plaintiff at a foreclosure sale. All of the defendants’ exceptions concern the judge’s rulings that the issue of the plaintiff’s want of good faith when it took title at the foreclosure sale is not relevant in summary process. The judge was right. The purpose of summary process is to enable the holder of the legal title to gain possession of premises wrongfully withheld. Right to possession must be shown and legal title may be put in issue. Sheehan Constr. Co. v. Dudley, 299 Mass. 51, 53. Legal title is established in summary process by proof that the title was acquired strictly according to the power of sale provided in the mortgage; and that alone is subject to challenge. If there are other grounds to set aside the foreclosure the defendants must seek affirmative relief in equity. New England Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Wing, 191 Mass. 192, 195, 196. The rule applies here. The issue of lack of good faith is not available to a defendant in summary process.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DIPLOMAT PROPERTY MANAGER, LLC v. JAMES A. LOZANO & another.
102 Mass. App. Ct. 57 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2022)
21st MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. BRUCE CLARK DeMUSTCHINE.
186 N.E.3d 216 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2022)
Reem Prop., LLC v. Bigelow
123 N.E.3d 802 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2019)
Thorup v. Hodges
111 N.E.3d 306 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2018)
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Marroquin
74 N.E.3d 592 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2017)
Santos v. U.S Bank National Association
54 N.E.3d 548 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2016)
Gold Star Homes, LLC v. Darbouze
49 N.E.3d 686 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2016)
Klevisha v. Provident Funding Associates L.P.
167 F. Supp. 3d 250 (D. Massachusetts, 2016)
ClearVue Opportunity XV, LLC v. Sheehan
2015 Mass. App. Div. 125 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 2015)
Pinti v. Emigrant Mortgage Co., Inc.
33 N.E.3d 1213 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2015)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cook
87 Mass. App. Ct. 382 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2015)
Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Rogers
2015 Mass. App. Div. 68 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 2015)
LNV Corp. v. Duzan
2014 Mass. App. Div. 78 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 2014)
U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Schumacher
467 Mass. 421 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2014)
Bank of America, N.A. v. Rosa
999 N.E.2d 1080 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 N.E.2d 795, 350 Mass. 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wayne-investment-corp-v-abbott-mass-1966.