Wayne County Bar Ass'n v. Naumoff
660 N.E.2d 1177, 74 Ohio St. 3d 637
Opinions
After reviewing the record, we adopt the board’s findings and conclusions. However, we note that we publicly reprimanded respondent on October 16, 1991, for charging an excessive fee. We, therefore, impose an actual suspension of six months on respondent and tax costs to him.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wayne County Bar Ass'n v. Naumoff, 660 N.E.2d 1177, 74 Ohio St. 3d 637 (Ohio 1996).
660 N.E.2d 1177 (Wayne County Bar Ass'n v. Naumoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Nosan
840 N.E.2d 1073 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kathman
2001 Ohio 157 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Pavlik
2000 Ohio 219 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pavlik
732 N.E.2d 985 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Columbus Bar Assn. v. Culbreath
2000 Ohio 336 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Wayne County Bar Ass'n v. Naumoff
670 N.E.2d 998 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
In Re Mid-America Living Trust Associates, Inc.
927 S.W.2d 855 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1996)
Wayne Cty. Bar Assn. v. Naumoff
1996 Ohio 244 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)