Wayland Bryant v. Mel Bailey
This text of 464 F.2d 560 (Wayland Bryant v. Mel Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Wayland Bryant was convicted in Alabama State Court of assault with intent to murder. He was sentenced to serve five years in Alabama state prisons. He has now filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, claiming that the State’s failure to provide him with a free transcript of his preliminary hearing constituted a violation of due process of law and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. He unsuccessfully sought similar [561]*561relief in a petition for writ of mandamus filed in the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals and in a petition for a writ of certiorari filed in the Supreme Court of Alabama successively. His appeal on the merits from his conviction is presently pending and undecided in the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals. The District Court correctly held that he had failed to exhaust state remedies. The judgment is affirmed. See Williams v. Bailey, 5 Cir., 1972, 247 F.2d 463 which decided the same issue adversely to appellant’s position.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
464 F.2d 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wayland-bryant-v-mel-bailey-ca5-1972.